| HN Mirror

I think you answer you unknowingly answered your own question. The reason no such tool exists is that this stuff is very hard. Worse, it is something that sounds and looks easy. Terrible graphs and misleading ones are not the result of maliciousness and cunning deception. Rather it is the opposite. Bad graphs happen because it is easy to visualize data, but hard to create good and meaningful visualizations[0]. It is because most people mindlessly apply a set of procedures to select the correct graph, not knowing the reasoning behind those procedures. It is in part due to the large quantity of people that have learned this and normalize/perpetuate the myth that visualization is easy. Because they do not distinguish the action from the end result. Just in the same way you might be able to perform all the manual tasks to assemble a house (use a screwdriver, hammer and nail, saw, fit pipes together, etc), it would be naive to assume that you could assemble a house. The reason there's so many terrible graphs is because it is easy to build a shanty and you rarely see an actual house to tell you what you're missing.

I doubt we'd see such a tool anytime soon. It takes expert experience and skill to make good visualizations and there are no well defined rules. If you see such a tool, I'd be wary of promises that are too big to be kept.

[0] Sometimes people complain about how something has a difficult/steep learning curve. It is important to note that while frustrating, this does not always make the learning curve a bad thing. Often a shallow learning curve can be bad because it convinces one that they have far greater ability than they actually do. We could argue that this is in part due to the improper way we visualize learning curves.