[uconnectlol]

regulation fixes nothing and just makes everything worse in the big picture

> no recording in public

this is the only one that sounds like good common sense but isn't even regulation it's just law any sort of legal system would enforce.

all these "safety" things means ai offerings are all useless like google after 2003 when anything you query like "list of fad diet" is transformed into instead of an answer to that "problematic" question, an answer to "NVM LOL HERE IS A LIST OF HEALTHY DIETS"

> can't train on copyright material

that's so dumb. this world has no interesting copyright content coming out for 2 decades, it's literally all sellouts. losing to AI (which will happen regardless of whether the training material contains any copyright content) is exactly what they deserve. don't forget that these are also people who sue random civilians for "damages" that only exit in their head. sellout culture no longer even applies to musicians and book authors, it's also the majority of software too, with people just creating software for part of their resume, or some crowdsource shit, or a blog. any software anyone makes in a corporation is just to host an ad or be a dev tool for people who just host an ad

[maximus-decimus]

If you think copyright in general is dumb, then the U.S. should drop it together. Keeping copyright for humans but allowing "copyright laundering" by using A.I. is dumber IMO.

[rsynnott]

> but isn't even regulation it's just law

EU regulations are law.

> any sort of legal system would enforce

Many countries (the US, for instance) do not have such a blanket ban. For instance, see this nonsense: https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/friend-ai-artificial-inte... - its whole value proposition is indiscriminate public recording.