[wazoox]

> If you don't consider that hard work or decision-making abilities at least factor into the subsequent states of existence in which people find themselves, what good would data points or arguments be?

Hard work and good decisions are important of course. But there are good "data points" showing that people struggling with difficulties can't make good decisions. And to do hard work, you need to have an environment that allows it; for instance think about these American travellers of the 19th century shocked by Japanese laziness: we quite well know now that Japanese are hardly lazy, but in the 1840 there was simply nothing effective to do. At the individual level, hard work and good decisions matter; at the society level, not that much.

> I'm still curious when I see people express opinions like yours, though.

I find less surprising that people express such opinion as yours, because they usually attribute their own feelings a bit too literally onto others.

> With all those preconceptions, what kind of affinity would you have with a site like Hacker News that glorifies the success of the entrepreneur?

I'm a successful enough entrepreneur (depends upon your metrics of course). And I'll keep my misconceptions rather than John Galt's, if you don't mind.