> OpenAI is currently working on the next step: agents and planning. They are close. Other competitors will shortly follow. Their stocks will rise to unprecedented levels. You have been warned.
Any day now everyone will adopt bitcoin and the value will skyrocket and we’ll all be exceedingly rich, HODL, gl, wgtm, to the moon.
Not saying they’re not working on stuff, but that’s what you sound like. OpenAI is amazing at generating hype, but the competitors are catching up, or outpacing them, and OpenAI source models are never far behind.
https://aibusiness.com/nlp/openai-is-developing-ai-agents probably. But I'm not sure how much they need to innovate on that front. There's good agents progress happening everywhere around already. OpenAI could provide some options to make it faster/cheaper, and running the workflow internally would make it faster, but... doesn't feel necessary.
> AI agents differ from robotic process automation (RPA), which still needs developers to manually code steps needed to complete a task, Luan said.
OK, so it's robotic process automation then (aka screen scraping / UI automation), just without the hand-written automation code.
My frustration with the term "agents" is that it can mean a lot of different things - but people always seem to assume that their own personal definition is the same that everyone else is using.
Any day now everyone will adopt bitcoin and the value will skyrocket and we’ll all be exceedingly rich, HODL, gl, wgtm, to the moon.
Not saying they’re not working on stuff, but that’s what you sound like. OpenAI is amazing at generating hype, but the competitors are catching up, or outpacing them, and OpenAI source models are never far behind.