[robxorb]

> "I'm just shocked they don't want more coverage of these things and not less."

I'm having real trouble parsing this, can anyone break down the double-negative for me? Or does it simply not make sense?

[dooglius]

If you leave off the "and not less" it's more readable and you get the point

[hapidjus]

Why would they want less coverage not more?

[zem]

they should want: more coverage, and not less [coverage]

they will be getting (due to this measure): less coverage, and not more

so it sounds like they don't want more coverage (and not less coverage), which is shocking