[meroes]

That’s sounding much more biological than a neural net now. Neural nets are much quicker to adapt to new parameters. Coelacanths and humans aren’t. Which was my point if 12,000 years isn’t enough whereas neural nets are rapidly changeable, maybe we can’t do this equivalence in calling humans neural nets.

[exe34]

are you maybe mentally inserting "artificial" in front of "neural network"? if so, do you also see GPUs in biology?