[ned_at_codomain]

We think BoxyHQ does a nice job.

We prefer our approach for basically two reasons:

1. BoxyHQ wants you to do SAML-over-OAuth. We support this -- especially for NextAuth compatibility. But we don't think it's always helpful.

2. We think our service is easier to use. We most commonly hear complaints from users/customers about complexity, so we try really hard to make SAML obvious and simple. Ultimately, it's up to you whether we meet that bar.

[crngefest]

Would you mind elaborating a bit why you don’t think SAML-over-OAuth is a fits-all solution? To me it sounds like eating your cake (SAML) and having it too (not having to use SAML)