|
|
|
|
|
by ecshafer
689 days ago
|
|
I think there are some really good responses from the polyculture movement in agriculture. I am not a biologist or farmer or chemist, so this is at best my five year old explanation. But different organisms use different chemicals, and produce different chemicals as byproducts. Polyculture farming is when you plant multiple types of plants in a single field. So one row might be beans, one row corn, one row squash (the classical example is the "three sisters" plants from native american agriculture). These plants make use of different chemicals, so there is less destruction of the soil, and requires less fertilizers and chemicals to successfully grow, because the plants aid each other instead of fighting over the same resources. The ecosystem itself, which is impossibly complicated, is a large scale example of this. There are cycles of different organisms consuming resources, and creating new resources which are then consumed, etc. |
|
That man was unable to walk on the next morning by a 'mysterious' irreversible nerve damage, and is still in a wheelchair since that day. Bad things happen, sadly. But happen more often to those that don't care about biodiversity
Maybe people should start to care.
Maybe if something kills animals is in our best interest to understand that we don't want this stuff around. We are animals too.