Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by __MatrixMan__ 693 days ago
I don't know if the AI's have an endgame in mind. As for the humans, I think it's an internet built for a dark forest. We'll stop assuming that everything is benign except for the malicious parts which we track and block. Instead we'll assume that everything is malicious except for the parts which our explicitly trusted circle of peers have endorsed. When we get burned, we'll prune the trust relationship that misled us, and we'll find ways to incentivize the kind of trust hygiene necessary to make that work.

When I compare that to our current internet the first thought is "but that won't scale to the whole planet". But the thing is, it doesn't need to. All of the problems I need computers to solve are local problems anyway.

1 comments

Arguably, trying to scale everything to the whole planet is the root cause of most of these problems. So "that won't scale to the whole planet" might, in the long view, be a feature and not a bug.
Right. If your use case for the internet is exerting influence over people who don't trust you, then it's past time that we shut you down anyhow.

For everyone else, this transition will not be a big deal (although your friends may ask you to occasionally spend a few cycles maintaining your part of a web of trust, because your bad decisions might affect them more than they currently do).