[coffeecloud]

What’s the difference between “constantly monitor behavior in order to coerce a desired response” and “enforcing the law”?

Are traffic cameras a slippery slope to cameras in your house to make sure your aren’t doing drugs or building an unpermitted additon?

[chank]

They definitly can be. That's the slope. Where do you stop. Any totalitarian worth thier salt can easily make that leap. Use monitoring to curb one type of crime and "undesirable" behavior, why not use it for other types and before you know it, your entire existince is monitored in detail just to make sure you're acting exactly the way "they" want you to. That's how it works. The "I have nothing to hide" is a long debunked argument.

[coffeecloud]

Then why enforce any laws? Any enforcement is on the same slippery slope.

I don’t think slope is nearly as slippery as you claim. There are miles of high friction slope between enforcing traffic laws on public roads and totalitarianism.

[chank]

Edgar Friendly said it best: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjoSQ-lCA58