[superkuh]

Of the subset of unintentional crashes it's hard to say how many of them are from irresponsible driving behavior. But I do know that the vast majority of people driving around me on highways/freeways/etc do not obey the speed limit and instead just sort of travel in high speed flocks. Like they don't care that they're operating extremely dangerous vehicles doing an extremely dangerous thing. This is not intent to cause harm but more like playing catch with a loaded firearm.

[Zak]

People driving at the speed of surrounding traffic are not creating a particularly high risk even if their speed exceeds the posted speed limit. People driving at a different speed from surrounding traffic do create an unusual risk, even if that speed is legal and the other drivers are speeding.

This becomes less true in places like Germany where lane discipline is very strict. It's not rare to see extreme speed differentials on unlimited speed sections of German Autobahns, but it is rare to see crashes there.

[KennyBlanken]

> People driving at the speed of surrounding traffic are not creating a particularly high risk even if their speed exceeds the posted speed limit.

The whole "everything is fine as long as everyone is doing the same speed" bit is a myth.

For every percent increase in speed, this leads to a 2% change in injury accidents, a 3% change in severe injury accidents and a 4% change in fatal accidents.

https://road-safety.transport.ec.europa.eu/eu-road-safety-po...

More about speed vs injury/death rates:

https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/new-crash-tests-show-modest...

https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/speedmgt/ref_mats/fhwasa1304/Res...

Why? Kinetic energy is a function of velocity squared, influencing injury severity and stopping distances.

[ryandrake]

Just to be clear, are you and others in this thread advocating driving the posted 45MPH speed limit on a highway where the actual flow of traffic is going 65MPH? And you don't think that's going to be disruptive to the point of causing accidents?

[superkuh]

Just to be clear, are you and others in this thread advocating for driving 20 mph faster than the 45 mph speed limit just because you see other criminals doing the same? That's wildly illegal and would probably get your license revoked.

[Zak]

That's essentially the situation on the highways through Atlanta. It's so extreme that some students made a video[0] demonstrating the extreme effect on traffic when drivers in every lane maintain the speed limit.

Their conclusion is that the speed limit should be increased; there are other reasonable conclusions one might draw, but I would argue against the one that follows from your comment: that nearly every driver on the road deserves punishment.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoETMCosULQ

[superkuh]

Changing the speed limit to the current status quo "speeding" is the reasonable thing, yes. We've already accepted that rate of lives lost at the higher speeds so make it official. Law breaking while driving should not ever be the status quo. It's an absurd situation that one almost has to break the law to drive.

I would be very interested in if people would then go the reasonable new speed limit or if they would continue in their speeding flocks and only travel even faster. To me it seems like their speed is mostly something they evaluate relative to the rest of the drivers and not to absolute speeds so it'd take quite a change in behavior.

As for [0], the traffic back-up proves only that the vast majority of people on that road are speeding.

[JoeAltmaier]

Illustrating the difference between being a safe responsible driver, and pedantry.

[JumpCrisscross]

> People driving at a different speed from surrounding traffic do create an unusual risk, even if that speed is legal and the other drivers are speeding

Driving the limit in the right lane is almost always fine.

[superkuh]

People who do not drive the speed limit are objectively breaking the law. And generally each flock travels at a different speed. After all, they have no way to communicate a common speed standard like, say, a speed limit.

[chrstphrknwtn]

I agree say this is generally true in the United States, where driving discipline on highways is basically non-existent. Although I would stop short of calling it "extremely dangerous".

[tomgp]

How many people would need to die each year for it to be considered extremely dangerous? Literal wars have been started over fewer deaths than the US road network racks up in a year. OK I’m being facetious but the extent to which we’ve normalised 40,000+ deaths a year really is remarkable, can you imagine the reaction if smart phones killed that many?

[chrstphrknwtn]

Sure, it's problem.

But speeding-related fatalities accounted for 30% of traffic fatalities in the US for 2022. Which implies there are plenty of other issues, such that I think saying "speeding is violence" doesn't really do anything to address the problem.

[KennyBlanken]

Roadway injuries and deaths are both leading causes for many demographics and the US has a death rate three times Canada's, per capita. More than 4x the UK's.

I'd call that extremely dangerous...

[chrstphrknwtn]

And 70% of those deaths are not considering "speeding-related"[1].

Focussing on speeding seems to ignore that there are other serious issues that contribute to the outsized danger on US roads.

[1] https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/motor-vehicle-safe...