|
|
|
|
|
by crystal_revenge
684 days ago
|
|
This is the correct approach, but having done A/B testing for many years (and basically moved away from this area of work), nobody in the industry really cares about understanding the problem they care about prompting themselves as experts and creating the illusion of rigorous marketting. Correct A/B testing should involved starting with an A/A test to validate the setup, building a basic causal model of what you expect the treatment impact to be, controlling of covariates, and finally ensuring that when the causal factor is controlled for the results change as expected. But even the "experts" I've read in this area largely focus on statistical details that honestly don't matter (and if they do the change you're proposing is so small that you shouldn't be wasting time on it). In practice if you need "statistical significance" to determine if change has made an impact on your users you're already focused on problems that are too small to be worth your time. |
|
I think the dumb underlying question I have is - how does one do experimental design
Edit: and if you aren’t seeing giant obvious improvements, try improving something else (I get the idea that my B is going to be so obvious that there is no need to worry about stats - if it’s not that’s a signal to chnage something else?