Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jajko 695 days ago
Or taking a guided climb of Mt Everest, roughly same numbers (compared to Aconcagua which sits around 30%)
2 comments

Aconcagua is not notoriously difficult, and around 1k people per year summit. I can't find anything that says that hundreds of people per year are dying.

Do you mean Annapurna? It, at one point had a death rate above 30%, but is now below 20%. K2 has taken over the crown for deadliest mountain with a death rate of 24%

>compared to Aconcagua which sits around 30%

??? Aconcagua doesn't have an especially high fatality rate.