[encoderer]

What’s naive is defending a study here after it’s been disproven. But please go off about tired pilots.

[crazygringo]

Whoknowsidont was giving a detailed, valuable response to your specific question about pilots and surgeons.

And then you insult them for "going off about tired pilots", and falsely claim they were defending the study in question.

You might want to review the HN guidelines:

> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[encoderer]

I asked about pilots being hungry. He went on about them being tired.

If you’re interested in tone policing, start with his reply.

[whoknowsidont]

>What’s naive is defending a study here after it’s been disproven.

I was refuting your point; I didn't even reference the study let alone defend it.