|
|
|
|
|
by david-gpu
697 days ago
|
|
> But what does it even mean for a government to extend debt to itself? You may be interested in reading about Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). I'm not an economist, but had a mild interest in macroeconomy some years ago and found MMT eye opening. |
|
What I was trying to ask there is what does it mean for debt to exist when there is no relative risk?
When a third party extends debt in good faith, it says something about their estimation of risk.
When a government extends debt to itself it literally means nothing, if one party fails they both do. More importantly, there's no recourse if the debtor defaults. The debt there exists purely as smoke and mirrors, it is created only so they can claim money wasn't made out of thin air.