[bamboozled]

If our bodies were peak, we wouldn't need to use hundred(s) of hours of exercise per year to force muscular and cardiovascular improvements, it would just happen.

Then what would be the point of living if you had nothing to do but wait for updates? How boring.

Even a self-improving machine is spending time, not exercising but “designing a better version of itself”. Which is an “exercise”.

I hate to say this but I think your comment misunderstands the beauty of life and the challenge behind the struggle to improve. It is a blessed journey.

I personally think being fallable and not having full control of my destiny, while scary, is a feature and not a bug. It seems to make existence exciting.

[BriggyDwiggs42]

“Nothing to do” is not the same as not having to exercise. Exercise is quite boring, and you’d have more time to appreciate the beautiful things if you didn’t have to do it for maintenance.

[bamboozled]

It's boring "for you" that is your opinion, I absolutely love hiking, weight training, football and surfing. I am a physical person. If you find it boring, that's your own preference.

[BriggyDwiggs42]

Yeah i find it boring unless it’s gamified, like in sports. Nothing wrong with feeling differently though.

[HeyLaughingBoy]

> you’d have more time to appreciate the beautiful things if you didn’t have to do it for maintenance

Some people manage to do both at the same time.

[BriggyDwiggs42]

Okay, good for them

[Dylan16807]

> nothing to do

> Which is an “exercise”.

You're arguing against a strawman. I'm not complaining about working for self-improvement, I'm complaining about how muscles shrink away so rapidly when not in use. Look at what happens when people are bedridden for a few weeks, that is not good design!

And I'm not saying people should automatically look like body builders, I'm saying the baseline should be a healthy level.

[bamboozled]

Each of your muscle fibres contain what is known as myonuclei. These are a structure within the muscle cell that act as the ‘brain’ of the cell – in this manner, they are what tells the muscle fibre to grow in response to strength training.

Interestingly, when you undergo a period of strength training, you see an increase in the number of myonuclei within your muscle fibres.

And this increase is permanent.

[1] https://foreverfitscience.com/exercise-science/is-muscle-mem...

I had a child, took a year off lifting, or basically doing anything but walking, I didn't lose much mass or strength and it hasn't taken me long to get back where I was, I'm pretty happy with the current design, maybe you should train more so you actually have some muscle in case you do need to spend a few weeks in bed?

[elcritch]

I'm pro genetic modifications for these sort of (slight) changes. We live in entirely different environments and our baselines to be healthy makes sense to me. Of course the next step always seems to be "make superhuman soldiers" or "designer babies".