[trealira]

Avoiding side effects as much as possible is not a new idea, though; it's been around since at least the 80s. You can just ask people who have worked on Haskell code written in the past 25 years to determine for yourself if the idea aged well or poorly. Opinions will probably be mixed, though, not clearly one way or the other.

[mrkeen]

The definition of "side effect" has to mean something, otherwise it defaults to the opinion of whoever wrote the code.

  // Not a side-effect (intentional)
  if(++i++) {
  }

[trealira]

I don't understand how this relates to my comment. I'm saying that avoiding side effects isn't a new idea, so it already has aged, either well or poorly.

[wredue]

I don’t really care about the opinions of Haskell coders, as they are probably the only programmers on earth that have more terrible dogmatic ideals than uncle Bob does.

[tome]

If you're open to challenging your preconceptions (dare I say dogma?) about Haskell programmers then I'm willing to share my opinions on good software development and how Haskell helps, based on over a decade of professional experience with Haskell. Free tidbit: I find effect tracking to be extremely beneficial to software engineering in the large.