[elahieh]

Section header: "Who's data is it?"

Couldn't they have had an LLM proof-read they're paper?

[batch12]

I've been seeing this a lot lately. Everywhere from screen printed signs to news tickers. I'm not sure if this is because it's new or if I'm just now seeing it.

[elahieh]

Yeah, call me snobby or OCD but I lost confidence in the authors and reviewers when I saw that slipped through.

Then I started wondering if this is going to become the new anti-AI marker. AI-written papers use "delves", "underscores" and "showcasing" too much. Avoid those words, throw in some errors and readers will think your paper was written by humans.

[treebeard901]

Their probably just unaware of the affect they're words wood have on us. Its no big deal and we should just except it. I wouldn't altar a single word. They've been served there just deserts, and I would of maid the same mistake. Let sleeping dogs lay. They probably never past English class anyway, and your far two picky about these things.

[kolinko]

As for authors - perhaps english is their second language? Regular spellcheckers don’t check grammar well enough.

[rjurney]

You fucks, I just learned about this. I feel so stupid!

[6510]

"unsafe" language is your friend.

[ziofill]

They’re?

[marktam264]

I know, right? Their grammar is, as if, they’re not there?

[thierrydamiba]

I think it’s a play on “who’s line is it”

[dools]

But whose line is it anyway is spelled whose because it’s a possessive pronoun. Who’s means who is or who has.

Who’s up for some donuts?

Whose turn is it to go to the shops?

Who’s seen my car keys?

[Asraelite]

In this context it's a possessive determiner, not a possessive pronoun.

[serial_dev]

Its still whose, sorry to tell you, your misstaken

[ohthatsnotright]

Their mistaken what?