|
|
|
|
|
|
by cryptonector
700 days ago
|
|
|
> I though it was clever, and I was a bit enamored when I first heard it (having come from a C# background). Now, I think implicit interfaces are simply, obviously right. What, no. No, implicit interfaces are not right. They are a footgun. That you provide some interface needs to be declared. I dislike unnecessary ceremony as much as anyone, but this is necessary ceremony. |
|
|