|
|
|
|
|
|
by twosdai
700 days ago
|
|
|
I think the point of the article was to explore and create a rough system for evaluating rules and creating a "fair" (in the terms of the article fair) system where simultaneous moves are allowed. I don't think anywhere its stated that the author wanted to leave a game unchanged. Or as unchanged as possible. In this perspective I think this article/exercise is not "an utter failure". Its pretty decent. |
|
|