[tuetuopay]

> RAID56 under Btrfs has some caveats but I'm not aware of any annecdata (or perhaps I'm just not searching hard enough) within the past few weeks or months about data loss when those caveats are taken under consideration.

Yeah this is something that makes me consider trying raid56 on it. Though I don't have enough drives to dump my current data while re-making the array :D (perhaps this can be changed on the fly?)

[SirGiggles]

What's your starting array look like? If you're already on Btrfs then I recall you could do something like `btrfs balance -d raid6 -m raid1c3 /`

https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Balance.html

[tuetuopay]

Yeah I'm on btrfs raid 1 currently, with 1x1TB + 2x3TB + 2x4TB drives. Gotta love btrfs's flexibility regarding drive size :D

I'll have a look, thanks! I guess failing this will make me test by backup strategy that I have never tested in the past.

[bscphil]

Out of curiosity, how much total storage do you get with that drive configuration? I've never tried "bundle of disks" mode with any file system because it's difficult to reason about how much disk space you end up with and what guarantees you have (although raid 1 should be straightforward, I suppose).

[tuetuopay]

I get half of the raw capacity, so 7.5TB. Well a bit less due to metadata, 7.3TB as reported by df (6.9TiB).

For btrfs specifically there is an online calculator [1] that shows you the effective capacity for any arbitrary configuration. I use it whenever I add a drive to check whether it’s actually useful.

1: https://carfax.org.uk/btrfs-usage/?c=2&slo=1&shi=1&p=0&dg=1&...

[SirGiggles]

Just want to do a follow up and make a correction that the command to go from whatever to RAID 6 for data and RAID 1c3 for metadata in Btrfs is instead: `btrfs balance -dconvert=raid6 -mconvert=raid1c3 /` instead of what I originally posted