|
|
|
|
|
by dspillett
700 days ago
|
|
The original comment implied that parsing JSON was less efficient (either in terms of coding required, or the resulting CPU use) than parsing iCal. While it is true that dealing with json by hand is going to be more work than just importing an iCal library, I'm comparing apples to apples and suggesting dealing with json "by hand" is no more faff than dealing with iCal "by hand", and that dealing with either via a good library equally gives no benefit to iCal. |
|