|
|
|
|
|
by darushimo
5122 days ago
|
|
"That is not a viable option to tar them with accusations of not taking." Right, but this does suggest a good way for them to give a good faith effort. What if they put the effort into contacting all X content providers/publishers who 'earned' $Y or more? Even if it were somewhat costly, my appreciation would kick in if I knew they spent time to contact everyone who had earned $20 or more. Even if the rest of the money went to charity, I'd still have a higher opinion of the way they've ended this operation. Update: Their terms of services (7b, "Payments") states they won't pay out for amounts under $50. Sounds high given the expectable long tail, but they could put in work to contact those publishers. |
|