Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by koolba 694 days ago
> They didn’t allow their clients any opportunity to test those changes before they took effect

I’d argue that anyone that agrees to this is the idiot. Sure they have blame for being the source of the problem, but any CXO that signed off on software that a third party can update whenever they’d like is also at fault. It’s not an “if” situation, it’s a “when”.

1 comments

I felt exactly the same when I read about the outage. What kind of CTO would allow 3rd party "security" software to automatically update? That's just crazy. Of course, your own security team would do some careful (canary-like) upgrades locally... run for a bit... run some tests, then sign-off. Then upgrade in a staged manner.
Pretty sure many people see the point of having Falcon as a reason to not have an internal security team.

Outsource everything.

This is a great point that I never considered. Many companies subscribing to CrowdStrike services probably thought they took a shortcut to completely outsource they cyber-security needs. Oops, that was a mistake.