|
|
|
|
|
|
by catalypso
696 days ago
|
|
|
> I'll be calling "private" repos "unlisted" That might be a bit too strict. I'd still expect my private repos (no forks involved) to be private, unless we discover another footnote in GH's docs in a few years ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ But I'll forget about using forks except for publicly contributing to public repos. > Users should never be expected to know these gotchas for a feature called "private". Yes, the principle of least astonishment[0] should apply to security as well. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishmen... |
|
|