Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dmazzoni 697 days ago
Why can't they just do it more like Microsoft security patches, making them mandatory but giving admins control over when they're deployed?
1 comments

That would be equivalent to asking "would you prefer your fleet to bluescreen now, or later" in this case.
Presumably you could roll out to 1% and report issues back to the vendor before the update was applied to the last 99%. So a headache but not "stop the world and reboot" levels of hassle.
With the slight difference that you can stop applying the update once you notice the bluescreens
Those eager would take it immediately, those conservative would wait (and be celebrated by C-suite later when SHTF). Still a much better scenario than what happened.