[fch42]

I was (more) of a Solaris/x86 kernel guy on that particular level and know the x86 kernel did not use task gates for doors (or any context switching other than the double fault handler). Linux did taskswitch via task gates on x86 till 2.0, IIRC. But then, hw assist or no, x86 task gates "aren't that fast".

The SPARC context switch code, to me, always was very complex. The hardware had so much "sharing" (the register window set could split to multiple owners, so would the TSB/TLB, and the "MMU" was elaborate software in sparcv9 amyway). SPARC's achilles heel always were the "spills" - needless register window (and other cpu state) to/from memory. I'm kinda still curious from a "historical" point of view - thanks!

[p_l]

The historical point was that for Spring OS "fast path" calls, if you kept register stack small enough, you could avoid spilling at all.

Switching from task A to task B to service a "fast path" call AFAIK (have no access to code) involved using WIM register to set windows used by task A to be invalid (so their use would trigger a trap), and changing the ASID value - so if task B was already in TLB you'd avoid flushes, or reduce them only to flushing when running out of TLB slots.

The "golden" target for fast-path calls was calls that would require as little stack as possible, and for common services they might be even kept hot so they would be already in TLB.

[__d]

Is the Spring source available anywhere?

[p_l]

Unfortunately, as far as I know, not. Only published articles and technical reports :(

[__d]

I once had the university CD-ROM release, but I've lost it, sadly.