[8note]

Isn't the MIT license the generally accepted "open source" license? It's a community owned term, not OSI owned

[yjftsjthsd-h]

MIT is a permissive open source license, not the open source license.

[henryfjordan]

There are more licenses than just MIT that are "open source". GPL, BSD, MIT, Apache, some of the Creative Commons licenses, etc. MIT has become the defacto default though

https://opensource.org/license (linking to OSI for the list because it's convenient, not because they get to decide)