Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by alexjplant 699 days ago
Because it's often a lie (at least in my experience). When I worked in defense contracting people loved trotting out stuff like "the work is stable", "you can't get fired from a government job", etc. all while dealing with furloughs, government shutdowns, geographic consolidation of work to different states, contracts changing hands, companies being acquired, etc. Employment in the US is at-will and nobody is going to guarantee you a job, especially these days, and employers at the lower echelons of the industry are very fond of selling the dream of "stability" by sowing fear of the unknown to prevent attrition while building a culture of malaise and low compensation.

I'm not saying that one should work exclusively for seed-stage crypto startups that sell blockchain-verified probiotic dog food or anything, but at some point you should critically examine whether it makes sense to be someplace that's 10 years and tens of thousands of dollars behind the curve just because it's "stable" when it so obviously isn't.
1 comments
redserk 699 days ago
Defense contracting is not a government job.

You work for a private organization that provides services to the government.

Big difference.

link
alexjplant 699 days ago
...where did I say that it was? They're both in the same space (figuratively and sometimes literally) and both of them have the same problem insofar as they aren't as bulletproof as they're made out to be. You can, in fact, be fired from a government job and things like the government shutdown circus and BRAC are real.
link
redserk 699 days ago
My apologies if I misinterpreted. I assumed it was tied together with this:

> When I worked in defense contracting people loved trotting out stuff like "the work is stable", "you can't get fired from a government job"

It's truly a shame that the employees who keep the government glued together -- be it via direct government employment or contracting -- are subject to unnecessarily turmulous conditions because of one political party's antics.

link
alexjplant 699 days ago
_My_ apologies for not making the distinction more explicit - reading it in hindsight it is a bit ambiguous.

In an ideal world the government would operate a little more sanely but I'm not holding my breath.

link