[MrSS]

Grammarly has to be able to connect back to their online service while the button addon could be implemented in a way that it can read every website but not send antyhing anywere (in theory, the addon could of course simulate a form and send data out through that or somehow).

But yeah i tested grammarly for 5 minutes and found it crazy.

there has to be a better way getting both worlds :|

[dspillett]

In DayJob we've had to block (actually block, because people didn't listen to being asked not to use it and similar tools) Grammarly because it sending text that could potentially include client data off to their servers for checking would have given us a nasty fail should a client request or conduct an audit.

As an alternative there is LanguageTool which you can install locally. We have it running on a small VM that people can configure their installs to talk to, and block the public service end-point (as sending to that would be a big no-no for us for the same reason as Grammarly). It doesn't have all the features of Grammarly so isn't a complete drop-in replacement, but the self-hosted version works as well as the free features of Grammarly.

[Suppafly]

>As an alternative there is LanguageTool which you can install locally. We have it running on a small VM that people can configure their installs to talk to, and block the public service end-point

I'm surprised that Grammarly hasn't come up with a local service like that, I bet they have a ton of enterprise users that would appreciate it.

[bargainbin]

Local software of course! But good luck getting funding for a product that doesn’t phone home every 5 seconds and present an opportunity to plague the user with ads “that they want to see”

[vstollen]

I haven’t used it myself, but the LanguageTool browser extension might allow users to use a self-hosted or locally running instance.