| The Republican aversion to "trans" is the type that's built around promoting conservative gender roles, and is only a small part of the bigger picture of opposition. It's different in other countries. In the UK, for instance, most of the pushback has been from grassroots feminist organizations who point to the misogyny and sexism that's been enabled and promoted by "gender identity" beliefs being woven into policy and law. We do see it being challenged in this way the US too, from the left, e.g. - https://karadansky.substack.com/p/why-i-think-were-much-furt... > Ideology of trans? The regressive belief that women and men are defined as "gender identities" rather than based upon the material biological reality of sex. > And speaking of mutations, bravo on twisting my statement on homophobia into some squirrelly critique that justifies your fears. It's not fear, this is reality. A couple of examples of this homophobia: - https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/04/03/trans-activists-shu... - https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-57853385 > but is ultimately on the wrong side of history. I doubt it. The right side of history surely cannot be one that destroys every female space and erases homosexuality in the name of "progress". |