|
|
|
|
|
by rpdillon
703 days ago
|
|
I see what you're getting at, but this requires far too much trust in the administrators. Transparency is critical in proceedings like this. Also, the statement is worded in a way that suggests he was removed for a cause that is unknown, and independently had a CoC violation brought against him that is still being mediated. Therefore there can be no outcome there yet. Which makes me wonder when they removed him for cause, what exactly that cause was. I think blindly accepting decisions of authority is dangerous. |
|
If you don't use GNOME, why is this interesting to you anyway?