| I think some of the information here is misleading and a bit unfair. > being too intrusive and affecting their workflow Kolide is a reporting tool, it doesn't for example remove files or put them in quarantine. You also cannot execute commands remotely like in Crowdstrike. As you mentioned, it's based on osquery which makes it possible to query machine information using SQL. Usually, Kolide is configured to send a Slack message or email if there is a finding, which I guess can be seen as intrusive but IMO not very. > reading and reporting all files It does not read and report all files as far as I know, but I think it's possible to make SQL queries to read specific files. But all files or file names aren't stored in Kolide or anything like that. And that live query feature is audited (ens users can see all queries run against their machines) and can be disabled by administrators. > web browsing history This is not directly possible as far as I know, but maybe via a file read query but it's not something built-in out of the box/default. And again, custom queries are transparent to users and can be disabled. > Kolide's whole spiel about "honest security"[1] reeks of PR mumbo jumbo whose only purpose is to distance themselves from other "bad" solutions in the same space While it's definitely a PR thing, they might still believe in it and practice what they preach. To me it sounds like a good thing to differentiate oneself from bad actors. Kolide gives users full transparency of what data is collected via their Privacy Center, and they allow end users to make decisions about what to do about findings (if anything) rather than enforcing them. > It's built by Facebook alumni, after all, and relies on FB software (osquery). For example React and Semgrep is also built by Facebook/Facebook alumni, but I don't really see the relevance other than some ad-hominem. Full disclosure: No association with Kolide, just a happy user. |