|
|
|
|
|
by DemocracyFTW2
702 days ago
|
|
I will not comment on a now-obscure putatively secure system (which presumably has not been battle-tested, at scale, with network cables plugged in, under modern-day conditions) vs UNIX and its derivatives, but I will say that MS Windows has been lacking security considerations right from the outset. Incidentally, the most recent Outage of Global Reach (OGR—there, I coined it) was due to millions of Windows machines infected. So I think the argumentation should be: Corporate cares so little about resilience, diversity of approaches and stability and so much about fast money and good quarterly reports—they tend to just throw millions of identically-configured Windows boxes at a problem instead of even considering some or all could run a different system. So, if anything, all considered it's really more damning. |
|