[Avamander]

Microsoft is also trying to make drivers and similar safer with HVCI, WDAC, ELAM and similar efforts.

But given how a large part of their moat is backwards compatibility, very few of those things are the default and even then probably wouldn't have prevented this scenario.

[nullindividual]

Microsoft has routinely changed the display driver model, breaking backward compatibility. They've also barred print drivers.

[nimish]

> large part of their moat is backwards compatibility

This is more of a religious belief than truth, IMO. They could strong-arm recalcitrant customers, but they don't.

[vetinari]

> They could strong-arm recalcitrant customers, but they don't.

They really can't. When the customers have to redo their stack, they might do that in a way that doesn't need Microsoft at all.

[nimish]

These customers wouldn't be able to do that in time frames measured in anything but decades and/or they would risk going bankrupt attempting to switch.

Microsoft has far more leverage than they choose to exert, for various reasons.