|
|
|
|
|
by raggi
697 days ago
|
|
yup, not an extensive list, but further demonstrative: - terminal emulators are not security hardened clients against malicious actors
- ssh lacks PKI and is inconvenient so users never do prekeying in practice, so it's TOFU / zero server assertion in most practical cases (i.e. easy to mitm)
- ssh channel features are a constant concern, for server resources and for client features like agents, agents are easy to disable
- most ssh implementations don't scale that well, it wasn't ever really a goal to do so
- there are few tools for auditing and monitoring, unlike the common protocols/services/clients
fun for toys, but i wouldn't put credit card details in there, unlike some streamers started doing lately. |
|