|
|
|
|
|
by DannyBee
706 days ago
|
|
" Infineon's quality department should have immediately reached out to NASA (or more specifically NASA's contractor working on the electronics)." Is there any actual evidence they didn't reach out to every single buyer of the electronics? The article goes out of its way to say Infineon did not contact NASA. But even in your description, they would not have, they would have contacted NASA's contractor working on the electronics. I still go back to "if there was actual evidence that Infineon did not notify who it was supposed to, the article probably would have cited it". There isn't, so they instead cast aspersions. Instead they make a bunch of hay about a statement from Infineon that seems totally innocuous - they didn't notify people they didn't know about. Shocker. Look, i actually hate Infineon - i've been forced to try to make their wifi and bluetooth modules work properly before ;-) But this kind of lazy-at-best journalism doesn't help anyone. |
|