[EnigmaFlare]

If you go that far into respecting things, why stop at life? We treat molecules pretty poorly, ripping them apart, discarding their unwanted body parts, etc.

So it's a bit silly to base morals on anthropomorphism. Instead, these long-lived rules about eating humans, pork, cows, etc. are probably based on practicalities. I don't quite know what they are but you can imagine that allowing cannibalism would be a step closer to farming people to eat which has to be a very tantalizing prospect since the livestock can also run the farm, making it completely free food! Or maybe it's to do with disease transmission. Pork is easy to get food poisoning from if you don't cook it properly. Maybe cows are worth more for milk than meat during a famine, and people might worsen their long term situation trying to survive in the short term by killing their cows.

I agree broccoli's great. It the main vegetable I eat.

[6510]

That's it, they should have murdered everyone except the slaves. The livestock can run the farm themselves without management.

What still bothers me about the story is that they ate the steak and that it was served at all. Why would you bother to hide the slaves and cook a slice for the people not suppose to see them? Would they really be that naive?

A bit like vegetarians and vegans forgetting that in order to grow the fruits and vegetables everything previously living there was killed or displaced.