Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ben_w 705 days ago
> not-insignificant

> 0.3%

> the closest we have

I don't understand why you're trying to paint the battery as a significant contribution here.

Like a car battery, although it's neat that they consider it as part of the engineering, it's none of the actual thrust unless it explodes.
1 comments
DarmokJalad1701 705 days ago
It is about 1 megawatt (1341 HP) of the power pushing the rocket into the sky (directly translated into exhaust velocity and therefore thrust). That would be like a spark plug generating 1 HP in a 300 HP engine (Which would exhaust the typical car battery in about 1 second if it could even push that much power out).

It is all semantics anyway.

link
DarmokJalad1701 704 days ago
Correction: It won't drain in a second. But my point is the same. We don't really have 1 HP spark plugs out there :)
link
ben_w 704 days ago
Rough estimates I've seen say the starter motor is about that, though. (Not that I can tell real pages from GenAI ad content farms, I'm not a petrolhead).

I'd agree "it's all semantics", but yours are confusing me :P

(And for energy content, like for like is comparing the size of the fuel tank with the capacity of the battery, but cars aren't 90% fuel by weight).

link