[interpunct]

I agree. I recently started using an R4RS Scheme called "STk", the precursor to STklos, which I modded into a build system (replacing Make and Sh, for the most part) and a graphics DSL front-end to C. The author wrote a demo app web browser with Scheme as a scripting language, as was the original plan with Mozilla, and Tk as the GUI. Writing extensions in C is a breeze too, as it supports dynamic loading:

https://github.com/egallesio/STk

I like Common Lisp too, although not as much as Scheme day-to-day--it is nice now to have both. I was thinking about adding a TinyCLOS using Common Lisp. Pseudo Scheme transpiles source to CL, so I might be able to do it with CLOS underlying it instead of how TinyCLOS does it.

Jonathan Rees, the original author, has a Pseudo Scheme repo up on Github, with a branch that uses ASDF (which I am testing with SBCL).

https://github.com/jar398/pseudoscheme

Thanks for your comment, and thanks to the maintainers of both of the linked Scheme implementations.

[fourthark]

> Pseudoscheme consists primarily of a Scheme to Common Lisp translator that is written in Scheme. To obtain a version of the translator that runs in Common Lisp, it is applied to itself.

Yes!