This article keeps talking about "the caucus problem", but never actually defines it. I couldn't follow the post at all because every problem kept ending with "but this isn't the real problem, the caucus problem is".
A caucus is defined and discussed in the previous post: “A caucus (and specifically an unmoderated caucus) is a type of meeting with no rules about who talks in what order or for how long.”
Agreed the post is confusing and could have used a summary of the preceding piece to be intelligible.
For everyone else who felt similarly, the explanation is in the previous post (linked near the top of the intro). I also found this confusing because the whole intro felt like it was building up to define the concept and explain why it’s a (the) problem. I even googled the term, thinking it may be some term of art I’m just not familiar with. Then I looked back at the intro again, and inferred that it must be pointing back into the post series… just conveying that poorly.
Agreed the post is confusing and could have used a summary of the preceding piece to be intelligible.
https://chelseatroy.com/2018/03/29/why-do-remote-meetings-su...