Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by doe_eyes 702 days ago
It's also easier than "gray market" sales. Bug bounties pay for a wider variety of bugs, including plenty of stuff that's of no interest to your perhaps-Saudi buyers; and they don't require you to develop a weaponized exploit - "hey, I noticed this crashes" is often enough.

Plus, less risk of waking up and finding out you've been sanctioned by OFAC or something like that.

1 comments

curious why Saudi? Are they known to be prolific buyers of vulnerabilities?
They're rich, don't hold civil liberties in high esteem, and don't have a lot of in-house expertise. So, yeah - along with some neighboring states, they're a buyer for tools they use to target journalists, dissidents, etc.

China and Russia are on the same boat, but they are far more capable with in-house tech.

OK i see, re-reading this with your top level post is "not all vulnerabilities are the type that could be bought by (insert state actor)", which makes sense (for some reason I thought you meant that they were buying the type of bugs that would end up getting reported to a BBP, but I just misread the original comment).

And yes the Saudis definitely bought software from NSO Group but it's also been used by plenty of other governments, including half the EU...

Also, just to be clear - the US gov buys tons of zerodays.
NSA banking EternalBlue was the reason for Wannacry ransomware proliferation, which killed people due to downtime of hospital systems.
perhaps-Saudi-prob-Israel.

(Israel is known to be prolific; many brokers and the whole industry on all sides has a lot of people and entities from Israel. Saudi is publically obv active due to stories like MSB pwning Bezos over Whatsapp)

Yes, they used a WhatsApp 0day in the murder of Khashoggi.