[darby_nine]

> canonical Go CEL interpreter would cost several megabytes of runtime footprint (e.g. in a WASM bundle.)

At first blush Go seems incompatible with WASM in terms of maintaining Go's strengths—the two runtimes have different memory models and stack representations. I'm curious why one would choose Go if WASM were a target to begin with.

[1oooqooq]

because very few people porting things to wasm understand the model more than they understand the abi they are compiling code to.

asm is a dead art.