|
|
|
|
|
by groby_b
701 days ago
|
|
That is the worst case outcome of penalties, and it carries significant risk of whistle blowing. The default case will be compliance, because compliance is simply cost of business, something businesses understand well. Meanwhile, currently businesses are doing shit all about data breaches except handing out the absolutely useless "2 years identity monitoring", so from a consumer view it really can't get much worse. In general, the idea that penalties make people hide their bad behavior, so we shouldn't penalize bad behavior, is just extremely misguided. Because without penalties, we normalize bad behavior. |
|
As an Australian I am absolutely horrified that we continue to put people in jail who have blown the whistle on the government here, and it makes me think that large organisations are absolutely terrified about strong whistleblowing protections.
This all suggests to me that whistleblower laws would be very effective.