[philipwhiuk]

Actually no, we agree to provide it under two licenses, one of which is CC-BY-SA. We don't give them ownership, we give them irrevocable usage rights.

> You agree that any and all content, including without limitation any and all text, graphics, logos, tools, photographs, images, illustrations, software or source code, audio and video, animations, and product feedback (collectively, “Content”) that you provide to the public Network (collectively, “Subscriber Content”), is perpetually and irrevocably licensed to Stack Overflow on a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive basis pursuant to Creative Commons licensing terms (CC BY-SA 4.0), and you grant Stack Overflow the perpetual and irrevocable right and license to access, use, process, copy, distribute, export, display and to commercially exploit such Subscriber Content, even if such Subscriber Content has been contributed and subsequently removed by you as reasonably necessary to, for example (without limitation):

[abdullahkhalids]

Yes, but does that mean that SO is obligated to share the data with AI companies?

I know that the CC-BY-SA [1] says

> No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

But I don't know if it is relevant here.

[1] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

[toomuchtodo]

It just means others will scrape and push into the Internet Archive (or publish torrents). They aren’t obligated, but they also have little control regardless of gating mechanisms.

[fragmede]

That's just nitpicking on the definition of "do" and "own" though.

[philipwhiuk]

All law is nitpicking.