|
|
|
|
|
by lucianfelix
707 days ago
|
|
There's a recent ruling on the `verbatim` aspect: >The judge disagreed, however, on the grounds that the code suggested by Copilot was not identical enough to the developers' own copyright-protected work, and thus section 1202(b) did not apply.[...]
>Judge Tigar earlier ruled the plaintiffs hadn't actually demonstrated instances of this happening, which prompted a dismissal of the claim with a chance to amend it. [1] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/08/github_copilot_dmca/ |
|