|
|
|
|
|
|
by hi_dang_
701 days ago
|
|
|
I was hoping that someone in the comments talking the paper down would have published a paper or have had relevant publications of their own to point to. You know, meet the lads halfway sort of thing. So what I’m left with to judge instead is anonymous online commenters vs. the publication of 2 prestigious universities. Whose word do I take on this? Decisions, decisions. You can swap LM out with Web3 out with NFT out with Crypto in this case. |
|
|
Maybe you need to judge the contents of those online comments and the contents of the publication, instead of relying on argument from authority.