[coldtea]

Nope. In a discourse constrained by regular logic, it's a logically consistent argument. Their rules, not mine!

Any other movie quotes to put forward in lieu of counter-arguments?

[badmonkey101]

Invoking a fictitious god with any arbitrary property doesn't make your argument consistent - other then, that's just like your opinion man

[coldtea]

>Invoking a fictitious god with any arbitrary property doesn't make your argument consistent

Logical consistency only cares about propositions and their relationship, it doesn't care whether an entity involved in one is fictitious or not.