|
|
|
|
|
by acdha
5129 days ago
|
|
> First, HTTP pipelining exists. … and is not currently usable, nor as full-featured as SPDY even if correctly implemented by all vendors > If the answer is "no," you have no business complaining about HTTP's performance—managing your assets better will improve performance far more than using SPDY alone will Flat-out wrong: there are many use cases which require multiple requests (you only mentioned CSS/JS but images are significant, too) and this would be exhibit A for an HTTP deficiency: you've internalized the idea that a visitor to the site must download and process EVERYTHING you could ever use to avoid making multiple requests, wasting bandwidth and device CPU/memory because you're trying to use asset packaging as an end-run around protocol shortcomings. As for databases, this was a fascinating and completely irrelevant digression. |
|
http://www.guypo.com/technical/not-as-spdy-as-you-thought/