[danielmarkbruce]

> You state this as fact without providing a dataset to back it. I think this is not true at all.

Look at your own comments. My comment is effectively "people whose day job is to write, write the most". It's borderline self evident.

Your argument has devolved into: "people who write a lot are by definition successful. I wonder if there is a correlation between writing a lot and success."

[breck]

My bet would be that scientists write the most, not journalists.

You seem to have changed your position from journalists to "people whose day job is to write", which is good, as that includes scientists.

[rqmedes]

Marketing people write a lot more

[breck]

> Marketing people write a lot more

https://breckyunits.com/dataset-needed.html

[danielmarkbruce]

lol - so your opinions are valid, everyone else must bring data.

Here the dumb thing about this - almost anything worth discussing is uncertain, else it wouldn't be discussed. If the only way you can change your mind is for someone to present an absolute, water tight, backed up by data argument, you'll never change your mind. You make several assertions in this thread with zero data.

[breck]

> lol - so your opinions are valid, everyone else must bring data.

I never said that. Your new response asking for data to my comment is perfectly valid.

But this topic is not interesting to me enough at the moment to go dig up a dataset on it. Maybe someday.

[danielmarkbruce]

Please bring data for that.